🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and families are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing number of nations are considering parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and networks are "robbing our children's childhood". A law could be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to pass a law lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a similar action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the move does not enact binding law.

"An effective age limit is a useful starting point," said a leading European lawmaker behind the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in robust research".

Earlier, support grew behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. However, the administration committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have raised warnings. An organization set up by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful platform posts argues that a strict age ban might not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to build products and services that are secure and age appropriate for children," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, regulation is mostly unfolding at the local government level amid national stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional access dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced measures mandating parental consent for minors to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from various politicians to copy this path, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, additional states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies take a more nuanced position. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could backfire". The body notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve user protection.

While this worldwide discussion unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and others demonstrate that states around the world are no longer prepared to delay for the industry to self-regulate.